030176.com : The Life of Mads Kristensen http://www.030176.com/feed en-us http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Sweetcron mads@vadnu.dk reads: Getting Real About Creating Change <a href="http://bit.ly/bRR3gX" rel="external">http://bit.ly/bRR3gX</a> http://www.030176.com/items/view/4466 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:01:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10330628668 Getting Real About Creating Change http://www.030176.com/items/view/4467 Shared by MadsK

Helt enig i at sociale medier bare er en lille detalje i et meget større, mere komplekst og langt vigtigere spil.

I wrote a while back about social media and culture shift. I continue to believe that the biggest obstacle to social media adoption and integration is a culture shift, not an operational one. But there’s a subtle point to be made.

The culture issues that exist in these companies have been years – even decades – in the making.

So, social media didn’t cause the culture disparities. They’ve been there all along. But the new expectations for responsiveness, accountability, personality and human focus as a result of the potential and visibility of new communication have put a big, fat spotlight on where those values are missing. Social media may be part of the indicator, folks, but it’s not the issue.

Change is.

And change isn’t instant, nor is it usually easy. We’re not really asking for companies to embrace social media. We don’t really care if they’re on Twitter or blogging. Those are just details. What we’re asking is for them to take a good, hard look at why they’re doing business, for whom. We’re asking them to communicate better, more clearly, more genuinely. We’re asking them to spend the effort to rework the way they do business to make customers feel like they give a rip. Social media is just the soapbox we’re using to ask for that change. The road to hell is paved with good intentions, of course. I’d be willing to bet that hundreds of businesses that we would identify as not putting their customers first will tell you all day long that yes, indeed, that’s what they aim to do. It’s the rare, ruthless business that would say they truly don’t care about people (and if that’s the case, we can’t help them anyway).

But what we’re NOT doing well – collectively – is really illustrating the disconnect points where organizations’ expressed positive values don’t line up with the way they do things at a functional level.

We’re telling them to get on Twitter, but we’re really asking them to have more immediate and responsive customer service channels because their call center is a nightmare to navigate. We’re telling them to blog, but what we really want from them is to understand more about the people behind their business, and what they’re thinking and feeling and doing, and feel like they really want to share those things with us. I’m getting hungrier and hungrier for the next phase of this blog, because that’s where it’s all focused. It’s discussion with all of you about how to communicate, architect, and implement change. Big and small. Operational and cultural. Social media is one of the vehicles, but what we’re really focusing on is far, far more fundamental than that. It’s down at the roots of these businesses, and in the minds of the people that have build them. It’s in the intent, the approach, the thinking. That’s where the pivot point is. The challenge for us is to get thoughtful and articulate about what we’re really asking for. There may not be a one-size-fits-all approach to creating change, but we sure as hell can do a better job of cutting some clearer paths through the jungle that aren’t regurgitating the same old  generalized rhetoric. I’m committed, and ready to tackle the tough stuff. Are you with me? image credit: photofarmer Getting Real About Creating Change

]]>
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:38:00 -0800 http://altitudebranding.com/2010/03/getting-real-about-creating-change/
Extorting the last glimpses of creativity before the end of a long workday. http://www.030176.com/items/view/4465 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:34:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10326974548 @mobajo Vi skal sludre om sladder. http://www.030176.com/items/view/4463 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:33:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10319920939 Has just seen the most amazing and hilarious canvas of Steve Ballmer ever. Man, it would be nice in my office at home. http://www.030176.com/items/view/4464 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:28:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10319769551 Discussing tomorrows interview in 'Mennesker & Medier' with the host trying to get the facts straight and the discussion really interesting. http://www.030176.com/items/view/4462 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:07:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10319111005 Apparently DR.dk doesn't want me to watch their video clips online. Point taken. I'm out. http://www.030176.com/items/view/4459 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:26:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10316442434 Who the f*** makes a web player that can only turn volume down and not up again? Nuclear blast looming... http://www.030176.com/items/view/4460 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:24:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10316373894 Done with this months MSN MBU with priorities set. http://www.030176.com/items/view/4461 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:54:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10315649175 blogs in Danish: Et par tanker til et digitalt intellektuelt medieforlig <a href="http://bit.ly/dvf88h" rel="external">http://bit.ly/dvf88h</a> http://www.030176.com/items/view/4458 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:43:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10315386602 Et par tanker til et digitalt intellektuelt medieforlig http://www.030176.com/items/view/4457 Danmark har fået en kulturminister, der rent intellektuelt er til at tage og føle på. Uden at fornærme ret mange, kan man nok godt tillade sig at hævde, at Per Stig Møller (K) er den mest kulturelle kulturminister i klassisk forstand, dette land har haft i en meget lang årrække. Lige om lidt skal Per Stig i gang med at bevise, at han favner bredere end den klassiske veneration for "Kvit eller Dobbelt" og omfangsrige filosofiske tekster. At han også rummer det nye og spændende – og ikke mindst dets perspektiver for, hvordan kulturlivet i Danmark kan udvikle sig: Han skal i gang med at kigge på at få skruet et nyt medieforlig sammen. Vi er flere, der gerne vil give input til den proces. Ernst Poulsen er en af dem, Morten Saxnæs en anden. Og jeg selv vil også gerne give mit besyv med. Som det ser ud i dag, vil internetmedierne stadig komme til at spille rollen som lillebror i forhold til især de gode gamle printmedier. Og det uagtigt at internettet faktisk har overhalet aviserne som annoncemedie. Og det uagtet at rigtig mange mennesker i dag betragter adgang til internettet som en menneskeret – noget jeg ikke mindes at have hørt nogen sige om adgangen til aviser (deres øvrige kvaliteter i denne forbindelse helt ufortalte). Så hvis man fra Per Stigs stol skulle overveje nogle gode grunde til at opprioritere støtten til danske internetmedier, hvilke argumenter kunne man så overveje? Lad mig forsøge at komme med et par stykker. Man kunne starte med at tage det klassiske udgangspunkt; internettets demokratisering af alle ting og alle borgere i forhold til at begå sig som udgivere af eget originalt indhold. Alle og enhver kan i dag slå sig ned som ekspert i sin helt egen niche – "Kvit eller Dobbelt" 2.0 kan man vel kalde det – og komme til orde. Eksperterne har fået masser af nye muligheder for at komme til orde og være med til at sikre pluralismen i det danske samfund. Hvis det ikke er støtte værd, hvad er så? Derefter kunne man kigge på det fra en sportslig vinkel – som jo også er Per Stigs gebet – og kigge mere på forenings-Danmark. Hvad ville et rigtig godt udviklingsmiljø for små virksomheder, der udvikler netbaserede løsninger til forenings-kommunikation og -effektivisering ikke kunne gøre for medlemmer og måske især for de frivillige ledere, uden hvilke der slet ikke ville være noget forenings-Danmark? Man kunne sagtens forestille sig, at der med en god støtteordning for f.eks. startups med adgang til risikovillig kapital kunne udvikle sig en hel lille industri, der kunne supportere foreninger af enhver slags – og at denne industri rent faktisk kunne eksporteres. Endelig kunne man overveje statsstøttede tjenester, der gør det nemmere for skabere af unikt indhold at komme ud og blive set; en slags digital udgave Statens Museum for Kunst men bare med fokus på noget, der rent faktisk kunne bruges digitalt i det daglige og som igen kunne være med til at få andres øjne op for de danske talenter, der findes rundt omkring, og som egentlig bare venter på at få muligheden for at springe ud. Dermed kunne mediestøtte også blive en form for eksporthjælp og dermed gøre gavn flere gange – for de samme penge – i stedet for at forsvinde ned i et hul, som tilfældet er i dag. Det ville da være et klogt og godt fremskridt, ville det ikke?

]]>
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:56:00 -0800 http://mads-k.com/medier/et-par-tanker-til-et-digitalt-intellektuelt-medieforlig/
reads: Posterous: Fast and Efficient Social Sharing <a href="http://bit.ly/d0RZhU" rel="external">http://bit.ly/d0RZhU</a> http://www.030176.com/items/view/4453 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:52:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10311298491 Posterous: Fast and Efficient Social Sharing http://www.030176.com/items/view/4456 Shared by MadsK

Jeg elsker denne tjeneste. Punktum. We are crawling the Internet all the time; monitoring the latest trends and technologies, seeking, discovering. If you’re like me, during your web travels you often come across treasures you want to share. Some deserve a tweet; some belong on your pro blog; others on your personal blog. But sharing what you find can be time consuming and hinder your productivity. Posterous takes care of this problem for you by making it extremely easy to post content to the social media apps you use. Doriano previously described how you can use email to share photos through Posterous, but I’m going to talk about how easy it is to use the Posterous bookmarklet to share any content across multiple platforms. To create a Posterous account, you don’t fill out a registration form, you send an email. Then you get a confirmation email that will take you back to Posterous to add your social apps accounts to the service. Once you’ve added the accounts to which you want to be able to post, the next thing I recommend you do is install the bookmarklet. On the “Manage” page, under the “Posts” tab (the default) scroll down and find the “Posting” box. Click the bookmarklet link and follow the very simple instructions to add the Posterous bookmarklet to your browser’s bookmark toolbar. Now go to some content that you want to share and click the bookmarklet in your bookmark bar. In the window that pops up, you can customize the info you’re about to post:

Posterous grabs images, videos and sometimes text from the site and lets you pick which you want to use. You can add your comments and click “Post” if you want this item to go to all your social media accounts, or you can click “Advanced Options” and pick and choose which accounts to post to. For example, I only want this link to go to my Twitter account and a personal blog:

Tips: If you want to use a specific text excerpt from an article, select the text before clicking the bookmarklet, and it’ll be added to the image/excerpt options. Choose it, and it’s neatly inserted as a blockquote. If you want to send the item to a blog where you have categories, in the title field, type ((tag: Category1, Category2)), for example, and it will automatically be categorized on your blog. Note: Unless you want the cute puppy video you sent to your family blog, the excerpt of the article on agile programming you sent to your pro blog, and the photo of Freddie Mercury in an eyeball suit you just tweeted all to appear together in sweet cacophony on your Posterous site, you need to create multiple Posterous sites. This is easy to do, and you only have to add your social media accounts once. Then when you choose Advanced Options in the bookmarklet, a drop-down lets you pick the Posterous site you want the item to appear on:

I have only tested sharing with Posterous to a blog, Twitter and LinkedIn. If you post something to Twitter or LinkedIn, Posterous inserts a link that takes people to your Posterous site, not to the original site online. I assume the same is true of other social media apps, too. On a blog, the links go to the original item wherever it appeared online. I recommend testing Posterous a little bit at a time to see how it works for you. I’ve only talked about the bookmarklet here, but do check out the email options. The first thing I did with Posterous was take a photo with my iPhone and email it to Posterous, which automatically autoposted it to every service I’d added. Doriano explained how to email content to specific sites in his article, so check that out as it’s actually kind of hard to find the info on the Posterous site. Have you tried Posterous yet? What tools do you use for social sharing? Related GigaOM Pro content (sub. req.): Social Media in the Enterprise

]]>
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:44:00 -0800 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Webworkerdaily/~3/eD2BmCrBjx0/
blogs in Danish: Vælg nu den rigtige type konsulent <a href="http://bit.ly/a60BtI" rel="external">http://bit.ly/a60BtI</a> http://www.030176.com/items/view/4454 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:38:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10310918995 Vælg nu den rigtige type konsulent http://www.030176.com/items/view/4455 Hvis du har en udfordring, du skal have løst, og du gerne vil hyre en konsulent ind, hvad skal du så kigge efter? Det er spørgsmålet til 1 mio. kroner i en verden, hvor snart sagt alle kalder sig for ‘ekspert’, og det kan være meget svært at skelne, hvad der egentlig ligger bag de voldsomme ‘claims to fame’. Af samme grund vil jeg derfor vælge at dele svaret op i to dele, der begge centrerer sig om, at du først og fremmest finder ud af, hvad det er, du har brug for: En overordnet strategi – eller en helt konkret løsning. For at tage det sidste først er der næppe tvivl om, at du skal have fat i én, der rent faktisk har prøvet det før. Og som vel at mærke kan bevise det via cases og referencer. For når først musikken spiller og showet kører, kan det vise sig at være meget fordyrende og spild af tid at entrere med én, der har al sin ‘viden’ om tingene hjemme fra køkkenbordet. Til gengæld skal du så også være klar over, at når du hyrer en operationel type – en programmør – f.eks. får du ikke nødvendigvis ret meget strategi med i pakken. Det vil sige, at du kan ende op med den danske udgave af en IT-support outsourcet til Indien: Vedkommende gør det, du har stillet og defineret som opgave uden at spørge ind til meningen med det hele eller hvordan det overordnet passer ind. Hvorfor? Fordi praktikere har det med at være så optaget af det praktiske, de sidder med, at de ikke har andet end hån tilovers overfor ‘the bigger picture’ (og dig som kunde, men det er en helt anden sag). Hvis det derfor er ‘the bigger picture’ du er ude efter at få tegnet, har du også brug for en med en masse erfaring, men en som har arbejdet med tingene på en noget anden måde. Her har du ikke nødvendigvis brug for en, der kan sætte sig ned og kode hele skidtet for dig men mere én, der kan hjælpe dig med rent mindset-mæssigt at komme på rette vej og hjælpe dig med at få konkretiseret, hvilke initiativer, der er brug for for at det passer bedst muligt ind i den forretning, du lige præcis driver. En god test på en sådan type – udover at bede om cases og referencer – er at teste, om vedkommende forstår at lytte og spørge ind til din problemstilling. Jo mere vedkommende er i stand til det – og til at forstå og artikulere, hvordan det i hans eller hendes øjne passer sammen i den store helhed – jo større sandsynlighed er der for, at vedkommende rent faktisk vil kunne levere noget af værdi. Hvorfor nu hele denne smøre? Fordi nogle tror, at det ene per definition altid er bedre end det andet. Pointen her: Det afhænger helt af konteksten og af, hvad det er, du gerne vil opnå. Det er sådan set bare op til dig at tænke dig om, før du binder an med en konsulent.

]]>
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:28:00 -0800 http://mads-k.com/tjenester/vlg-nu-den-rigtige-type-konsulent/
reads: Why Every Company Is A Media Company <a href="http://bit.ly/aeWhaV" rel="external">http://bit.ly/aeWhaV</a> http://www.030176.com/items/view/4451 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:51:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10309590004 Why Every Company Is A Media Company http://www.030176.com/items/view/4452 Shared by MadsK

Jeg forstår stadig ikke, hvorfor dette tilsyneladende er raketfysik? What do you get when a VP of Influencer Relations from SAP, the founder of Silicon-Valley Watcher and former Financial Times Journalist and a Social Media strategist come together? The answer is lively discussions and debate about the impact of social media upon business. Don Bulmer, Tom Foremski and I have recently formed a lyceum of sorts and meet regularly to discuss this very topic.  In addition to thoroughly engaging and timely discussion, we are also forming a framework for understanding social media in a business context. We believe that social strategy is and needs to become about more than just marketing, and will be woven into the very fabric of the enterprise as a strategic platform.

We are actively exploring the idea that every company is a media company. Initially, I had a negative, knee-jerk reaction that this didn’t concept sound right. How can every company be a media company? Why would every company need or want to be a media company? When this idea was first introduced by Tom Foremski, my mind quickly went to a mis-interpretation of the concept.. every company is a media company meaning that each should be mini-publisher, every organization now needing to be burdened with complex publishing cycles. I recoiled from the thesis... Everyone knows that enterprise success is predicated on competitive advantage, best products and services, excellent customer service, and right pricing. Being a media company is the last thing strategic executives need to have on their minds to excel in today’s global economy!

But the more we talked about this concept – the better I understood and the more I agreed. The reality is that every company today and into the future faces a new reality: the need for speed and relevance in the market. Competition is stiff in most industries and due to the recession, we face a “new normal” of doing more with less budget, fewer staff, and a reduction in experimental or innovation projects that are geared towards discovery. Plainly spoken, companies need to “get it right” to survive. I have written extensively in my blog about the Engagement Cycle; the basic tenant is that the more a company engages with clients and prospects, the more likely they are to gain awareness, insight, and ideas into the market’s needs. Through the sheer act of engaging with the very constituents they hope to attract they can begin to strengthen relationships that are at the very core of the buyer decision-making process. This belief was reinforced through the research that Don and I did called The New Symbiosis of Professional Networks (under our research fellowships with SNCR) where we found that decision makers are increasingly relying on social media driven peer networks to make buying decisions. In fact, in-person and social media driven relationships are almost equally as trustworthy, according to the survey participants.

Re-enter the idea that every company is a media company…. Media, and specifically social media, is the wellspring for relationships. It is the source of information, collaboration and dialogue with the market that can, and will, inform enterprise about the needs of their buyers and influencers.

When media is used strategically and effectively, many of the answers to these burning questions can become clearer and help shape competitive strategies for success. On the flip side, people are already talking about notable companies, brands and products. The dialogue already exists, outside the control of the enterprise throughout online and offline channels – in email, phone conversations, industry gatherings, Twitter, blogs, online peer networks and groups The buzz – both positive and negative- happens with or without intervention but unlike in the past – before social media – enterprises now have an opportunity and, in fact, a standing invitation to participate. And, they also have an opportunity to share the leading thinking in the market. Most successful companies got to their levels of achievement, in part, due to their deep understanding of their industry and its nuances. Thought leadership is the new relationship conduit. Through the effective use of thought leadership platforms, made so agile on social media, companies can “be the media” by sharing and showcasing content and ideas of value. They can participate and in some instances lead and shape the dialogue, not as an overt marketing channel, but through earnest efforts to educate and inform about the issues and topics relevant to their segment.

As Don so eloquently summarized in a recent blog post on the topic “The way that people (consumers, employees, partners and influencers) are using social technologies to inform, shape and share their opinions has quickly become a priority for business leaders to understand and appreciate as they (re)define their corporate strategies and operational business plans. Many companies are actively looking to incorporate ‘social strategy’ and social thinking into the core of their innovation process (research and development), service and support operations, sales and partner programs, and of course employee engagement efforts.”

So, through this lens of urgency and strategic value, Tom Foremski, Don Bulmer and I have begun to capture key concepts, best practice and look forward to the future where all competitive organizations are weaving social strategy across the value chain. We are soon to launch a new blog together to explore the ideas with you and are also creating a framework for putting the ideas into the business content to help companies in their charters.

Coming full circle to the platitude that every company is a media company, I believe the answer is yes! Through the act of creating, leading and engaging, companies take a more participatory role in shaping their future.

]]>
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:28:00 -0800 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/leadernetworks/syaG/~3/6v8H2oyCJog/why-every-company-is-media-company.html
reads: Big Media or Big SEO Spammers? <a href="http://bit.ly/ckdehk" rel="external">http://bit.ly/ckdehk</a> http://www.030176.com/items/view/4449 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:18:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10308603570 Big Media or Big SEO Spammers? http://www.030176.com/items/view/4450 Shared by MadsK

Grotesk taget i betragtning hvor meget mediehuse ellers klager over, at Google nasser på dem. Faced with declining revenues and increasingly dismal prospects, some  mainstream media outlets are adopting questionable tactics, specifically dead-end web pages stuffed with outbound links and pay-per-click ads. A liberally funded LA startup is only too quick to help them. The story starts with San Francisco-based sex writer Violet Blue. She used to be a columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle, the SF daily with ever-declining circulation.

Recently, while writing a column, she did a search through the archives of SFGate.com, the online presence of the Chron. She discovered that the web site was “copying” and “distorting” her column archives. (Here’s the link– Warning: Not Safe for Work) Here’s how she describes what she saw:

The column had been stripped of all links, and divided across several pages. My bio was missing, as were all the comments. Freakishly, all the commas were gone. And the URL had been changed. The address was comprised of words; to my horror the URL had been keyworded to say “ashamed porn star” — the exact opposite of the article’s content. There is a much bigger story here. It’s all in what’s going on with archive duplication and the nation’s old media newspapers online. I think that the work done to the duped content is done for the purpose of SEO (Search Engine Optimization). The idea here seems to be stripping content, duplicating it, make SEO’d content that is a dead end for readers, and drive up results with cost per click ads.

The San Francisco Chronicle, it seems, like the Los Angeles Times, is using the technology of an LA-based startup, Perfect Market, which has raised $20 million from Trinity Ventures, Rustic Canyon Ventures and others. Tim Oren, a venture capitalist at The Pacifica Fund, on his blog, Due Diligence, points out that while there’s nothing illegal about what the newspapers are doing, it does border on scraping. Typically, spammers scrape web sites, then set up shadow blogs and fill them with pay-per-click ads. As Oren writes:

The keyword and ad-stuffed dead end pages apparently produced by Perfect Markets’s technology are isomorphic, from a search company’s point of view, to those created by more questionable tactics such as scraping. The intent is the same: to spam the index. This is the behavior that routinely gets questionable sites shoved to Google’s back pages, or banished altogether. One has to wonder just how long this type of abuse will be tolerated, simply because it’s being practiced by a recognized media outlet.

I couldn’t agree more. Nor could I help but notice the irony, considering how quick the mainstream media is to lament the traffic-stealer that is Google. It wouldn’t surprise me if more newspapers adopted these kind of strategies.

Photo by Seattle Municipal Archives via Flickr / CC BY 2.0

]]>
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:15:00 -0800 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OmMalik/~3/_FW0MNvLDvg/
Getting up and ready for a new day. http://www.030176.com/items/view/4448 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:33:00 -0800 http://twitter.com/vadnu/statuses/10307077523